'Low performers are more engaged than the high performers?'
Read one of the tweets recently…trust me I was more shocked
than you though reading it further, only made me wonder about the gap in expectation
and performance . Even more, the entire HR metrics around it.
However if I myself look back during peak attrition times, the
entire bell curve goes for a toss when high performers leave voluntarily saving
low performers as an option to be retained back. This is called need of hour or
some are born lucky!!
Exit Interviews does give a feedback where high performers
leave due to work load, managing high employer expectation, work life balance
and above all working with a team members who without much efforts are paid at
par with them. We can’t blame the system, for it’s human nature to look for the
best resource while assigning any task and in most circumstances this become a
repetition.Initally such delegations are appreciated but we tend to forget that
an individual has a capability which would not withstand pressure beyond a
certain elasticity .Once we cross the said threshold, frustration is
inevitable. ? High performers are not easy to recruit but retaining and engaging
them with the organization is a challenge for all. What fun would be to lose
cash cows over a problem child?
It’s true every employee has different expectation but we should
try to understand that such situations might solve problems in short run but
going further will complicate issues. Many times high performers are unable to
cope up with additional pressures and work load and overnight the category
changes. What is expected other than an exit!!Timely cognizance will not just make
the employee feel cared but also re affirm his/her trust in the HR processes
and also help him/her stay engaged.
We would only flaunt those engagement rings when we are
happily married!!
1 comment:
Bang on Rakshita...:)
Post a Comment